oxHeiCGbdfSuzBgkzLm へのコメント

注:タグは使えません。改行は反映されます


タイトル(必須)
お名前(必須)
E-mail:(出来るだけ)
Home page URL:(あれば)
ここまでの内容をブラウザに記憶させる(タイトル以外)
コメント:(必須) Marissaさんは No.30881「oxHeiCGbdfSuzBgkzLm」で書きました。 >Your cash is being counted https://cubsontour.com/strattera-coupons-with-insurance-hkww getting off strattera side effects The result is a parody of an alternate, free-market model of reform. Rather than demand that consumers buy comprehensive insurance, the alternate model would have emphasized catastrophic coverage with high deductibles, which before ObamaCare were low-cost options for healthier consumers who wanted to indemnify themselves against unexpected major costs. Removing insurers from routine maintenance care would have restored price signals and competition to the family-practice market, which would have provided incentives for doctors to re-enter it. Consumers could then have used their HSAs, which are discouraged in the ACA system, to cover their own routine maintenance, and insurers could have returned to their proper role: Indemnifying people against major loss, not acting as wellness managers. That role properly belongs to patients and their physicians, not insurers and certainly not the government. >